The East Longmeadow health board is unelected and unaccountable to the town’s residents. Yet their mask mandates significantly affect all of us. Residents deserve more control over who will serve as a health board member. They also need some way to challenge unwanted or controversial health policies. I’ve written two ballot initiatives that would do this by (1) allowing voters to choose health board members through the election process and (2) making the health board subject to the “citizen relief mechanisms” in the town’s charter. If you’d like to read my initiatives click the link in the comments. If you’d like to sign the initial petition please contact me at email@example.com
I’ve started collecting signatures for a ballot initiative that would bring some accountability to East Longmeadow’s unelected Health Board members.
My two initiatives would do this by (1) allowing voters to choose Health Board members through the election process and (2) making the Health Board subject to the “Citizen Relief Mechanisms” in Article 8 of the town’s Charter.
If you support these initiatives, please sign the attached petition and return it to me at your earliest convenience.
When interpreting a disputed contract, Massachusetts judges must look at the contract itself as well as all other evidence that may help explain the meaning of the documents and the intention of the parties.
According to the Supreme Judicial Court,
Contract interpretation is largely an individualized process, with the conclusion in a particular case turning on the particular language used against the background of other indicia of the parties’ intention”…Thus, we must “construe the contract with reference to the situation of the parties when they made it and to the objects sought to be accomplished.” As a result, the scope of a party’s obligations cannot “be delineated by isolating words and interpreting them as though they stood alone. Not only must due weight be accorded to the immediate context, but no part of the contract is to be disregarded.”
If you are signing a contract–especially a long-term contract–it is crucial that you save not just the contract itself but every other record, email, text, or other pertinent document related to the agreement.
“The father of modern astronomy,” Nicolaus Copernicus was born in the Polish city of Torun in 1473. His father was a wealthy merchant, though he died when Copernicus was just 10 years old. Consequently, young Nicolaus was placed in the care of his maternal uncle, the Bishop of Warmia.
Copernicus began his education at the University of Krakow where he studied an array of subjects including medicine, languages, geometry, mathematics, and astronomy. Before completing a degree, he was sent to Italy to study cannon law at the Bologna University of Jurists.
Despite a lack-luster approach to his legal studies (it took him seven years to obtain his Doctorate of Canon Law), Copernicus passed the required examinations in 1503 and became a cannon lawyer. He returned to Poland and spent the rest of his career working as a clergyman in the Roman Catholic Church.
He’s best known for being the first astronomer to propose a heliocentric (Sun-centered) model of the solar system. For the previous 1400 years, educated Europeans adhered to the Earth-centered model of the solar system postulated by Aristotle and Ptolemy.
Copernicus’ ideas were first printed anonymously in 1514 in a short pamphlet entitled Commentariolus. He spoke with a number of friends and colleagues within the Church and they urged him not to openly espouse his theory. Copernicus took their advice and refrained from publicizing his ideas for nearly 30 years.
It was not until Copernicus was on his deathbed in 1543 that his ideas were finally made public. At the encouragement of Austrian mathematician Rheticus, Copernicus wrote and published De Revolutionibus or “On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres.” It’s said that a copy of the book’s first edition was placed in Copernicus’ hands just prior to his death, though this story may be apocryphal.
The book was an immediate source of controversy. Martin Luther, one of Copernicus’ contemporaries, referred to him as a “fool who wishes to reverse the entire science of astronomy.” And the Roman Catholic Church placed De Revolutionibius on its index of prohibited books in 1611, where it remained until 1835.
Tycho Brahe (1546-1601)
Tycho Brahe, the most accomplished celestial observer of the pre-telescope era, was born into the Danish nobility in the mid 16th century.
At the age of 12, his family sent him to the University of Copenhagen to study law in preparation for a career in government. While at the university, however, he observed the solar eclipse of 1560 and was greatly impressed by the fact that such an event could be predicted years in advance. From that moment on, he neglected his legal studies and devoted himself almost entirely to astronomy.
His first major work, De nova stella, was a report of a supernova he observed in the constellation Cassiopeia. As his fame as an astronomer grew, his government awarded him complete reign of Hven Island in the Baltic Sea where Brahe built his legendary observatory, Uraniborg.
He employed the young German mathematician Johannes Kepler to assist with his observations and calculations.
Brahe was one of the last great astronomers to reject the heliocentric system. Instead, he claimed that the planets obit the Sun but the Sun and the Moon orbit Earth.
Aside from his career as a scientist, Brahe had a colorful and rumpus life. As a young man, his nose was cut off in a drunken sword dual that began over a geometry problem. For the remainder of his life, Brahe wore a nose made of gold held on by glue or paste. He drank heavily throughout his life and died from a ruptured bladder that he suffered at a bouquet. He considered it impolite to take a trip to the bathroom during the event. He wrote his own epitaph which read “Lived like a sage. Died like a fool.”
A legal battle irrupted after Brahe’s death between his estate and Johannes Kepler. At controversy was who had the legal right to Brahe’s astronomical records. Luckily for posterity and science, the court sided with Kepler and Brahe’s observational data passed to him.
Christiaan Huygens (1629-1695)
Huygens is probably the greatest scientist that you’ve never heard of. He invented the pendulum clock, proposed the wave theory of light and the principle of conservation of momentum. He was the first to realize that Saturn was surrounded by a “thin flat ring” and also discovered the planet’s largest moon, Titan.
His major literary works were De Saturni Luna Observatio (1656) and Treatise on Light (1690).
Born into a wealthy Dutch family, Huygens was sent to Leiden University to study law in preparation for a career in diplomacy. He transferred to Orange College in Breda where he lived with a prominent jurist and completed his studies in 1649. Despite his legal training, Huygens had little interest in the law or a career in politics. Additionally, political circumstances in the Netherlands made it nearly impossible for Huygens to hold a diplomatic post. Instead, he devoted himself to science.
Gottfried Leibniz (1646-1716)
Gottfried Leibniz was born into a family of German academics in the mid 1600s. His father was a professor of moral philosophy and his maternal grandfather taught law. Leibniz attended the University of Leipzig where he studied philosophy and law, earning multiple degrees.
His first job was as legal advisor to the Elector of Mainz. After the Elector’s death in 1673, Leibniz became the librarian to the Duke of Brunswick, a position that allowed him pursue his interests in science and mathematics.
Today Leibniz is best known for developing the mathematical field of calculus. In England, at nearly the same time, Isaac Newton developed his own version of calculus without any knowledge of Leibniz’s work.
George Hadley (1685-1768)
Hadley was the son of a county sheriff in England. He went to Oxford University and later entered Lincoln’s Inn to study law. He was called to the bar in 1709 and began to practice law, though he was always more interested in physics and natural science. He was particularly interested in meteorology and he became the first person to explain the westerly flow of trade winds.
Hadley realized that Earth’s easterly rotation accounted for the wind patterns around the global. This effect has been dubbed as “Hadley’s cells”—a term still used by today’s meteorologists.
Charles Lyell (1797-1875)
Lyell was born into a wealthy Scottish family and sent to Oxford University at the age of 19. He studied classics and received a B.A. and M.A. from the university before moving to London to study law at Lincoln’s Inn.
The long hours of legal study irritated Lyell’s eyes and he often turned to geological work outdoors for relief. Despite having little interest in the law, Lyell completed his studies and earned admittance to the bar in 1825. That same year he published his first paper on geology.
He soon dropped his original career plans and pursued geology as his profession. His multi-volume treatise Principles of Geology became one of the most influential works of the 19th century. Lyell’s treatise convincingly argued that Earth’s surface was formed by gradual geologic processes over a long period of time, a concept called uniformitarianism.
His ideas greatly influenced Charles Darwin who first read Principles of Geology while on board the Beagle. Years later, Darwin would write
The great merit of the Principles was that it altered the whole tone of one’s mind, and therefore that, when seeing a thing never seen by Lyell, one yet saw it partially through his eyes.
Edwin Hubble (1889-1953)
Hubble was born in Missouri to a well-off businessman who worked in the insurance industry. In 1906, he won a scholarship to attend the University of Chicago. He became a Rhode Scholar and traveled to England to study law at the University of Oxford. Hubble had little interest in the law but pursued a degree in the subject at his father’s request. When his father died, Hubble (aged 25) ended his legal studies and focused on astronomy.
After serving in World War I, Hubble worked at the Mount Wilson Observatory in California where he developed and published his theory on “extragalactic nebulae” in 1924-1925 and his proof of cosmic expansion in 1929.
Many lawyers–particularly those with big reputations and/or egos–don’t bother to speak with their clients throughout legal proceedings. These lawyers often have an all-or-nothing approach to settlement and contract negotiations and, consequently, get unfavorable results for their clients. In this video I discuss how to choose a lawyer that’s right for you.
Legal research never gets easy. The volume of cases, statutes, and regulations on any particular issue is staggering. In this video I share my thoughts on legal research and discuss the best ways to approach it.
A subpoena directs a person to appear in court and testify as a witness. The procedure for serving a subpoena in Massachusetts is outlined in M.G.L. c. 233. I discuss the basics of preparing and serving a subpoena in this video.
If you’re called to testify at trial, make your answers as brief as possible without omitting important information. The more you talk about extraneous matters, the more you take away from the key points that you want to communicate to the judge or jury.
This month a district court judge in Middlesex County allowed a criminal defense attorney’s motion to
(1) suspend the use of breath test results in criminal matters pending throughout the Commonwealth,
(2) reopen the hearing on the reliability of the Draeger Alcotest 9510,
(3) order all breath tests from Alcotest 9510 breathalyzer machines that were last calibrated on or after April 19, 2019 excluded from criminal prosecutions.
The judge’s order is good for 60 days. During that time the state must address a number of issues that have been raised concerning the efficacy of its breathalyzers.
According to the court,
These issues clearly require prompt resolution. Breathalyzer results undeniably are among the most incriminating and powerful pieces of evidence in prosecutions involving either alcohol impairment or “per se” blood alcohol percentage as an element. Their improper inclusion in criminal cases not only unfairly impacts individual defendants, but also undermines public confidence in the criminal justice system.
The defendants’ attorney was Joseph Bernard whose office is in Springfield. He spoke about the case with Mass Lawyers Weekly saying
This machine has been riddled with issues, and the taxpayers, the citizens, along with the criminal justice system all deserve better.
To read the judge’s order, click the document below:
DESE has mandated masks for all schools across the state. But how the mandate should be enforced is up to the individual school districts. According to DESE, “Whether and when a student should be disciplined for failure to wear a mask is a local decision.” Perhaps it’s time to pressure our local school boards to stop any and all disciplinary action against students who refuse to wear a mask. What are your thoughts?