Failure to Understand or Read a Contract Is Not a Legal Defense

contract2cropped

Mass courts have repeatedly ruled that failure to read or understand a contract is not grounds for invalidating the agreement.

According to the Supreme Judicial Court,

One who signs a written agreement is bound by its terms whether one reads and understands it or not or whether one can read or not.  Cohen v. Santoianni, 330 Mass. 187, 193 (1953).

This standard applies even when one of the contracting parties does not speak English.  See Paulink v. American Express Co., 265 Mass. 182, 185 (1928).

If you have any questions about contract law, please contact me at justin@jrmccarthy.com.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s